Peter Campus

By Donald Kuspit, Artforum
May 1, 1998

In both the printed and the projected photographs shown here, from 1986 and ’87, peter campus pursues the theme of stone, “beautifully” and weirdly shaped by the sea’s touch. In the projected images the sea is missing; the eternal stone hangs, full of ineffable expressivity, like a planet suspended on a planetarium ceiling, the details of its luminous texture all the more mysterious for the vivid precision of their appearance (an effect that was intensified by the gallery installation, in which the images seemed to float on the walls of an otherwise completely darkened room). The projected images are especially disorienting because each stone is presented as pure “text”—that is, with no context except itself. In the prints, the stone is shown in the context of sea or shore, from which it rises ecstatically and mythically, as sacred and worshipable as the stone at Mecca. The shapes are infinitely variable, singular, and unfathomable. The stone seems to induce and concentrate a namelessly profound experience in its density. It is peculiarly sublime, for all its apparent specificity.

 

Whereas 19th-century American landscape painters signaled the immeasurable through dynamically open space, campus signals it through dynamically closed space: the immeasurable is impacted in the stone. As in those earlier evocations of the sublime, we are in the realm of pure nature, present not as symbol yet nonetheless full of inexplicable if amoral import. It is as though Frederic Edwin Church had applied the principles of his landscape panoramas to a single fact of nature, which thereby became a cosmos in itself—eternity in a giant grain of sand. campus monumentalizes a document of nature, making it ultimate beyond our wildest dreams, but with such literalness—as so completely itself—that it cannot be appropriated as a symbol, even though we are tempted to see in some of these ambiguous images our own “projections.” For instance, most people would read the configuration of shadowy abrasions and depressions in Murmur, 1987, as the features of a death’s-head.